 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
By Ehsan Honary - Thursday, May 03, 2007
::
1 Comments :: :: Psychology, Diplomacy
|
|
There are many times that you may be confronted with a situation that you like to instantly discover if someone is trying to deceive you. Is there a way to know for certain? Well, it turns out that there is indeed a technique you can use to know if someone is bluffing.
The Scenario
Let's walk through an example. Suppose you are playing Risk. You and your opponent have ended up sharing a continent. Your opponent wants to get rid of you and conquer the entire continent. He starts to threaten you and tells you that if you don't remove your armies yourself he will attack you and kill all your armies. You have a sizable army there, so he has to make a serious decision before he invades. If he invades, it will cost you but it will also cost him. You want to know if he is bluffing about the invasion. Although you don't want to leave, but if he is genuinely going to attack you, you may want to consider giving up and moving elsewhere. At least you have another chance to survive. Of course if he invades and you choose to stay, he will weaken himself as well. Hence, he has an incentive to bluff his invasion. The question is, how would you know if he is bluffing?
Analysis
All bluffers have one thing in common. They are all trying to provide a false impression of themselves. It turns out that bluffers, in their attempt to disguise their true intention, overcompensate the false impression. If you look for this, you can easily call their bluff.
Here is how it works in this example. If your opponent makes statements such as, "This continent is mine, if you don't move I will invade you until the last man is killed", "I don't care about myself, I just have to get this continent and it is mine anyway. You should just leave", "You have got nothing to gain if you stay. It would be a stupid move on your behalf", "Only newbies stay and fight".
In this case, your opponent is bluffing. A bluffer always tries to show himself as a confident player who knows it all. He creates a sense that he doesn't care when he does and vice versa. In doing so, he may easily overcompensate his actions. That's how you spot the bluffer. A bluffer doesn't really want to invade you. He just wants to scare you enough, so that you leave. Deep down, he is quite concerned if he has to attack you and potentially lose armies. As a result, if he feels that you are calling his bluff, he gets upset and angry. Now he has no choice but to invade you and that’s not what he wanted to do in the first place. His bluffing attitude therefore pushes him to overcompensate his invasion threat. In short, if your opponent appears to be strongly committed to his cause, no matter what, he is probably bluffing.
A player who is forced to invade you and is not bluffing will be unhappy about the implications of his decision and will let you know about it. His attitude is completely different from a bluffer. He appears upset. He has no reason to tell you continuously that his invasion will be disastrous to you. He knows that you are aware of this and understands his potential power in destroying you. He doesn't have to tell you how confident he is. It is the insecure person who wants to tell everyone how confident he is.
International Politics
You can use the same technique to discover the bluffers on the stage of international politics. Those who continuously complain and threaten invasions or penalties are likely to be bluffing. Undertaking an invasion or imposing a sanction on other countries does not come without a cost. It takes effort. If the sanction imposer appears to be very vocal and continuously declares that they would do anything they can to enforce their will on the other country, the chances are that they are bluffing. The bluffing nation usually exaggerates the implications of its decision (sanctions, invasion, etc.) to show that it really means it. In reality, it is no more than rhetoric.
If a nation was not bluffing, it may not care how confident it appears to others. After all, if they are going to invade or sanction the other nation, they will not worry too much if others are not going to believe them. They are going to do it anyway. In fact they will be focused more on the cost of the operations and its implications than to worry if their threatening message is getting through.
Conclusion
To spot a bluffer, all you need to do is to see if he is overcompensating his actions and attitude. A bluffer is eager to show you that what he says is indeed what he is going to do and in the process he ends up exaggerating. |
|
|
|
|
By Mr Strategist @
Monday, May 07, 2007 9:52 AM
|
|
This is quite inspiring for the current state of international politics. Iraq war after all wasn't a bluff and it certainly didn't feel like one at the time. The collation were more interested in the military operation than to care about the threat they were making to Saddam.
Glad that Saddam is gone, but I am not sure if the human and misery cost was wroth it. But that's a different issue. As for bluffing, it is interesting to see what happens next when nations start threatening others for a variety of reasons from development of nuclear weapons, to CO2 emissions, damage to environment, oil production, human rights and so on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |

|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Available as Paperback from Amazon
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
E-BOOK: Available in PDF, Kindle and on iTunes
You can read the Kindle version on any device where Kindle software is available. Currently this includes PC, Amazon Kindle, iPhone, iPad, Android phones and BlackBerry. You can also obtain the book directly from iBookstore on iPad, iPhone or iPod Touch through iTunes. The PDF version is free from any rights management protection (DRM) and is designed to maximise your viewing capability.
An e-book is the most ideal option for international customers as opposed to a paperback book. You can buy the book from anywhere and receive it immediately after purchase.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Latest Forum Posts
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
Global Siege Final Beta by GreenlandIceland | | MissionRisk reincarnated. Origional Risk board. I know most people love thier different maps, I can'... | RE: Play Risk Without The Countries by The Player | | There are no screenshots of the game on that site so cant tell what it is. From what I have see... | Play Risk Without The Countries by oldbard | | There's a great Risk game that many are playing right in their web browser... It's called The Grid, ... | RE: what to do by Ehsan Honary | | Please try again. If you are using Chrome, I suggest trying another browser as Chrome can sometimes ... | RE: what to do by A Risk Enthusiast | | Sorry for going off-topic, but I tried to create a thread about South America twice and it won't sho... | RE: World War II Risk by A Risk Enthusiast | | I think you should check out Axis & Allies... it is a World War II game, also with dice, but with mo... | RE: what to do by A Risk Enthusiast | | I suggest you take over Australia, take over China (to connect Kamchatka to Siam), and then fortify ... | RE: what to do by Ehsan Honary | | Riskguy, that's an interesting start. I am not sure how the map was set, but given the current layou... | what to do by riskguy7 | | I need to know what I should do. here is the set up for the beginning of the game and brown has made... | RE: A Sudden Fall by p.d0t | | hmmm... maybe turtle in Madagascar?
Truce with orange and see if you can talk him into breaking ... |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |

|