 |
|
|
|
 |
|
Forums
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
| Author |
Messages |
|
Imported Post
King
Posts:232
 |
| 16 Mar 2007 2:44 AM |
|
I accidently sent this to Fueggan personaly Yeah im comp. illiterate. But here it is.
HI Fuegan You and Ehsan seem to be the smart guys on this site. I bought & played risk 2, 3 yrs. ago. It gets boring playing the computer because its strategy is limited. Yeah sametime is very interesting, but the games strategy is even less developed, I began winning every game. I dont remember if it had the multiplayer option, I never played anyone else a realtime game. It seems to be to complex to manage without a computer. The games would devolve into squabbles about rules.
My strategy to win was simple: Add up the average number of forces and attacks. Pick my goal accordingly (making sure I had the power to do it). Factor in a surge attack. Hit the done button and watch the 'electric football phenomena'work it all out. the virtual enemies would over-extend themselves and/or not attack when they should.
I deleted the game after a year because I needed the 380mb it took on my hard drive and I was winning every game.
origamichessman |
|
|
|
|
cyray7
Diplomat
Posts:121
|
| 03 Jun 2007 9:52 PM |
|
| how is this a variation? i'm not following some of your terminology, i was just curious as to what game you were using? |
|
|
|
|
Europa
Diplomat
Posts:170
|
| 16 Dec 2007 5:33 AM |
|
| This looks like Risk II. It is true that the computer's strategy is limited, but I played this game with my friends using the Hot-Seat option and we used an LCD projector and a laptop and played in on the wall of our living room for a "War-Room" style game that just could not be beat! Felt like War Games! |
|
Grant Blackburn |
|
|
|
| You are not authorized to post a reply. |
|
|
|
ActiveForums 3.7
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|