Total Diplomacy Risk game strategies
 
Register  |  Login

Your No 1. Resource Site for Tactics, Strategy and Diplomacy
Used in Risk Board Game and in Real Life

What's on This Site: Use the Site Index

Articles

Minimize

Current Articles | Categories | Search | Syndication


Don’t Focus on Continents, Focus on Players

By Ehsan Honary - Thursday, August 09, 2007
4565 Views :: 1 Comments :: :: Tactic, Strategy, Real-world example, Beginners
 

You made all the right moves in a Risk game. You set yourself next to the most ideal continents. You created conflicts between other players and watched them as they fought each other. You thought only in a few turns you will collect enough armies for your large continent that you will emerge as a new world power. Suddenly, out of no where, a new player started to invade one player after another and got more and more powerful every turn. He conquered one player a turn until your turn was up. He eliminated you and went on to win the game! Sound familiar? This is commonly known as ‘the chain effect’.

A series of elimination moves by a Risk player can lead him to victory much easier than collecting armies for continents or staying in isolation for a long period of time. You need to make sure that you are not caught up in this, while at the same time, know when to take advantage of it when the opportunity comes.

As you may know, learning by example is perhaps one of the best ways to learn new techniques. This walkthrough shows you ' the chain effect’. The Risk game presented here was played between 6 players starting from random locations.

Total Diplomacy > Chain Effect Part 1

After a while, player settled into their preferred continents. Red was going for North America, while Yellow secured South America and is interested in Africa. Green had Australia and was focusing on North America for further expansion. Blue was still undecided. 

Total Diplomacy > Chain Effect Part 2

At this point, Red made a wise move. Red removed Green from North America effectively eliminating Green control in this region. Now Green had to focus on other parts of the world which indirectly benefited Red. Blue was making a move for Africa.

Total Diplomacy > Chain Effect Part 3

A major change occurred at this point. Yellow cashed cards and seized the opportunity to get Europe counting on promises by Blue that he will not attack South America.  The weak Black in Europe cashed cards and had the option of retaliation to fight the invading Yellow. Instead, Black made a better move. Black eliminated Green, got his cards and secured Australia, effectively leaving Europe for Yellow.

Yellow was pleased with the results at this point as he expected more difficulty in his compaign. Little he knew that he had started a ‘chain effect’.

Total Diplomacy > Chain Effect Part 4

Blue took advantage of this opportunity and thought that this must be his chance. He invaded Europe and even North America. His thinking was that he should weaken both Red and Yellow since they had continents and were becoming too powerful.

Total Diplomacy > Chain Effect Part 5

 In addition, he thought he could also get Europe.

Total Diplomacy > Chain Effect Part 6

As demonstrated in the next moves, Blue’s thinking was very wrong. He underestimated the dynamics of the game and that after a certain point, elimination becomes much more important than collecting armies for continents. At this point, Black had eliminated a player and had more cards than others. Blue’s move made him weak, but he also made Yellow and Red weak all for the benefit of Black. Black could eliminate any player with ease. Everyone had three cards at least which made them a great target for elimination. Black made a right move and eliminated Blue, cashed cards, then eliminated Red, cashed cards again and then eliminated Yellow.

Total Diplomacy > Chain Effect Part 7

Conclusion

Blue, Red and Yellow were responsible for their own downfall. By engaging in a useless conflict, they made it easier for Black to take advantage of them. They also failed to realize what was happening and carried on with their conflict (Blue’s move) regardless of the emergence of new powers in the game. Black could have easily been removed if Blue, Red and Yellow were content with their own continents. More engaging diplomacy was needed in the game to resolve matters between them before they got out of hand. Another lesson learnt is that isolation is not always beneficial. Red stayed out of the conflict hoping that the war between Yellow and Blue will make them both weak. The end effect was that he was not in a position to eliminate weak players and others could benefit from this (like Black). Those who benefited came back for him in the end.

Tip: You should only make others weak if you want to take them out yourself. Otherwise, you are making it easy for other players to take weak players out and receive the profit.

 
Rating
Comments
By Mr Strategist C @ Monday, August 13, 2007 9:44 PM
This situation happens to me all the time. In fact in almost all of the games I am playing (which is mostly online) I have to watch out for people taking people out until they get to me. So I am glad that you have mentioned this here, because as you rightly put it, it is an important issue.

Continents are worthless in the end of the game. You just need to go for cards. Also some online games add extra rules such as adding 5% extra armies each turn for each continent's bonus. This way continents will remain valuable even towards the end of the game. The down side is that these game can end up in a Marathon. There is always a balance to make ...

You must be logged in to post a comment. You can login here
Print  
 

Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

George Orwell

RSS Feed
Subscribe
Add to Google
Add to Netvibes
Add to My Yahoo!
                        
Subscribe to receive updates by Email
 
 
Book: Total Diplomacy, The Art of Winning Risk, Risk Strategies

New

Minimize
Available from Amazon
Index
Topic (Posts)
Best Content
 
 

Latest Forum Posts

Minimize
RE: Territory Grab 3
by Dan12
Risk Map: Scattered-Sight_3 --- Open Copy in Risk Map Editor my move, long live Africa!
Battle Report --- The song of Italy Part 1:The Chaos of War
by Great Alan
== Introduction == Recently,I'm playing the game of Italian Map in Landgrab Risk.The game have alre...
RE: Territory Grab 3
by The Player
Risk Map: Scattered-Sight_2 --- Open Copy in Risk Map Editor I quite like this territory grab s...
RE: help!!!
by novice
thank you very much!!!! now I understand what the levels mean!  
RE: help!!!
by Pxer
The first level of alliance only asks the other player to avoid attacking any of your wholly owned c...
RE: help!!!
by novice
thanks for reading the message....I have tried it...but I dont find an answer using google...but tha...
Territory Grab 3
by iConquered
I was reading these 2 ''Territory Grab'' topics on another page in this section and I found it very ...
RE: The skill of negotiation
by Ehsan Honary
A very good article Alan. I like it that you back up your strategy with historical examples. Definit...
RE: help!!!
by Dan12
I don't have Risk 2. I know you can do alliances through the settings menu so that you can declare a...
The skill of negotiation
by Great Alan
Hello,everyone.it's time for me to talk about Risk again.This is my first time that I wrote an artic...